<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">

    <channel>
    <atom:link href="http://www.therepublic.com/feed/person/ef0f1b46b8e7470ebcffad170bfe8e88" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <title>TheRepublic.com - Cedric Richmond News</title>

    <link>http://www.therepublic.com/feed/person/ef0f1b46b8e7470ebcffad170bfe8e88</link>
    <description>Cedric Richmond News and Photos</description>
    <dc:language>en-ca</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>webstaff@therepublic.com</dc:creator>

    <dc:rights>Copyright 2013</dc:rights>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.codeigniter.com/" />

    <item><title>Congress gets mixed advice on regulating drones</title><link>http://www.therepublic.com/view/story/f2b4a8db5ade4e17823af3710837d712/US--Domestic-Drones</link><guid>http://www.therepublic.com/view/story/f2b4a8db5ade4e17823af3710837d712/US--Domestic-Drones</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON - The growing use of unmanned surveillance "eyes in the sky" aircraft raises a thicket of privacy concerns, but Congress is getting mixed advice on what, if anything, to do about it.]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 14:47:23 -0400</pubDate></item>    </channel></rss> 

