The Republic Masthead

Letter: Offer incentives, health benefits to idled workers


Follow The Republic:


Note: The statements, views, and opinions contained in this letter to the editor are those of the author and are not endorsed by, nor do they necessarily reflect, the opinions of The Republic.

From: Pamela Weiss

Columbus

Received: Jan. 7

As the 2013 legislative session gets under way, the Republic reports that Rep. Milo Smith is proposing changes to unemployment benefits. The Jan. 6 story explained that a person may turn down a full-time job that pays less than what unemployment benefits do, because he loses the difference between the wages and the state benefit. Rep. Smith wants to “encourage people to stay off the system” by paying them some money if they took a job that paid less than the maximum weekly unemployment benefit.

I cannot blame unemployed workers for not taking lower-wage jobs while collecting unemployment benefits. They are going to make the choice that best benefits their family. Only if they are financially better off by accepting a job does it usually make sense to take the job. It is therefore incumbent upon the system to change the work incentive that pays less than unemployment benefits but would overall cost the state less in total unemployment benefits.

I applaud Rep. Smith for tackling this issue.

Before implementing policy changes, legislators should consider another job-compensation issue: health care benefits. An unemployed worker may have children receiving Medicaid benefits that are more generous than what a lower-paying employer may offer in health insurance benefits.

I can think of a family in which the unemployed worker, a computer programmer, has turned down contract jobs that pay even above unemployment benefits. Why? After factoring in the loss of Medicaid benefits for his five children and the high cost/low payout of the contractor’s alternative health care plan, he determined that financially his family was better off on the unemployment plus Medicaid.

Again, I cannot blame him for his choice. He is trying to provide the best situation for his family. If government would prefer people like him to take the job offer, there needs to be some bridge to cover increased health care costs coming off Medicaid.

I wish the Legislature all the best in formulating a plan that will give people an incentive to accept work while understanding that health care is a vital piece of an unemployed worker’s decision making.

Don't settle for a preview.
Subscribe today to see the full story!

  • Hybrid
  • $11/month
  • Sat / Sun Delivery
  • Sat / Sun Coupons
  • Weekend Magazines
  • Full Digital Access
  • E-Edition Access
  • Buy Now
  • Premium
  • $16/month
  • 7-Day Print Delivery
  • All coupons
  • Special Magazines
  • Full Digital Access
  • E-Edition Access
  • Buy Now
  • Digital Only
  • $11/month
  • -
  • -
  • -
  • Full Digital Access
  • E-Edition Access
  • Buy Now

Think your friends should see this? Share it with them!

All comments are moderated before posting. Your email address must be verified with Disqus in order for your comment to appear. If your comments consistently or intentionally make this site a less civil and enjoyable place to be, your comments will be excluded from it.
View our commenting guidelines and FAQ's here.

All content copyright ©2014 The Republic, a division of Home News Enterprises unless otherwise noted.
All rights reserved. Privacy policy.