Riverfront operating costs need greater clarity

The City of Columbus’ proposed Riverfront project is an effort to improve the section of the East Fork White River between the Second and Third Street bridges.

In concept, it has appeal: River overlooks, connections to the People Trail System and an in-water recreation park. That would appeal to many people and would likely draw more local residents and visitors to the area.

The Republic has supported the proposed $8.6 million project in the past, but recent concerns about flood cleanup cannot be dismissed.

That section of the river floods multiple times each year, requiring cleanup afterward by city crews. One concern is making a significant financial investment on an amenity that’s intended to be appealing, but loses appeal — at least temporarily — after flooding. It would then require cleanup efforts to get it back into shape.

That could involve clearing debris, removing sand piles and replacing landscaping. The parks department has limited resources, and creating more work for the staff without increasing department funding is not feasible.

Another concern is the proposal to install effect lighting under the Second Street Bridge. While there’s a wow factor in illuminating the area and possibly incorporating the city’s Dancing C’s logo and colors, that area already is a frequent spot for graffiti. Adding effect lighting seems like an open invitation for more vandalism.

The Columbus Redevelopment Commission needs to be more clear about annual operating costs related to this project so community residents and decision makers have a greater understanding of what the true cost to the community would be. The, we’ll have a better idea whether it’s an investment worth making.

Send comments to [email protected].