Bartholomew Consolidated School Corp. board members on Monday night approved a new policy that outlines how the district should go about counting and reporting incidents when a school employee is injured on the job by students, although further changes are likely.
The new policy, D525: School Employee Injury Reporting, comes against the backdrop of a state law from 2023, IC 20-26-5-42, which required each public school to provide data to the state about school employees on the job who were injured by a student in the previous school year.
During the first year of required reporting in 2023-24, BCSC reported the second-highest number of incidents in Indiana. However administrators said at the time that the numbers they submitted reflected over-reporting because of a lack of clarity from the state about what incidents should be submitted. Between the 2023-24 and 2024-25 reporting period, BCSC went from 142 reported incidents to 20.
But the number of “information-only” incidents has continually climbed over the past couple of years, according to District 1 school board member Jason Major, who authored the policy and receives confidential, information-only reports given to school board members from administrators quarterly.
Major stated that during a closed session in October 2025 regarding school safety, school board members learned that through the first three months of the school year, the number of information-only incidents was already at 80% of the total from the 2024-25 school year.
Information-only reports can range from a student stepping on a teacher’s foot to a student with special needs, for example, unintentionally striking a teacher. Information-only reports refer to any time a student and staff member had an incident resulting in a staff member going to a school nurse, but there was not a medical claim made.
Information-only does not necessarily mean the incident was minor, just that it didn’t currently meet criteria for formal action under policy or law.
The school employee injury reporting policy received its first reading during the school board meeting on March 2, although there was no discussion about it. The policy was finalized Monday by a 5-1 vote, with Board President Rich Stenner, District 2, the lone vote against because he thought the policy wasn’t fully ready. Nikki Wheeldon, District 7, was absent.
The new policy was not approved without school board members first bickering about procedural minutiae, disputes and finger pointing about which members actually are operating in the best interests of teachers and whether board leadership was slow-rolling consideration of the new policy.
Those interested can watch the matter discussed via a recording of Monday night’s school board meeting on BCSC’s YouTube page, starting at 1:15:50.
The school board initially was going to hold a work session to discuss the policy, but one was not scheduled in the time since March 2. The board did meet, however, for a closed session on March 23. Also of note is that spring break was held from March 16 to March 20.
Board leadership, in coordination with BCSC administration, is in charge of scheduling work sessions, according to BCSC officials.
Superintendent Chad Phillips remarked that there had been “multiple instances (in the past) in which a work session was requested, but was not scheduled before the next board meeting, just depending on the timing.”
Phillips emphasized that internal work is being done to produce a similar policy, also noting the district’s excellent teacher retention rates.
“That doesn’t mean we’re perfect, and it doesn’t mean that we don’t need to continue to share more information,” Phillips said. “But people are doing work right now to keep all of our teachers, staff and students safe.”
The policy wasn’t on the board agenda heading into Monday night’s meeting, but Major, before reading a long written statement, requested that it be added, which was approved 4-2, with Stenner and Dale Nowlin, District 4, voting against.
The policy drafted listed March 30 as the second reading of the policy, but Michael McIver, BCSC’s legal counsel, said that meetings are driven by the printed agenda.
McIver indicated that the policy as it was written was not fully fleshed out in his eyes, and that a work session would still be a worthy idea.
“What I would encourage the board to avoid is creating its own policy that creates a mandate to report without providing clear instructions as to what it is that the administration is supposed to report,” McIver said.
Informing that view is recently passed state legislation in House Enrolled Act 1249 that changes how school employee injuries are reported, replacing the 2023 law.
The new law treats injuries to school staff primarily though the lens of “battery,” making reporting requirements more about intentional acts such as teachers being hit or kicked than general injury tracking as was the case with the 2023 law. HEA 1249 also strengthens the criminal consequences of harming a school employee.
Assistant Superintendent for Human Resources Erin Stalbaum said that the reporting structure through the new law has not yet been clearly defined.
Nowlin, the school board’s legislative liaison, said that he had sent the policy to Julie Slavens, the senior counsel and director of policy services for the Indiana School Boards Association, who stated the policy was “excessively long,” Nowlin said, and that much of what was included in it would be better placed in administrative guides. Nowlin said he still believed the board should conduct a work session to work through details, but was generally in favor of such a policy.
Whittney Loyd, District 3, seemed to agree, saying that she had particular suggestions about the policy but that she wasn’t going to vote against it as of now because of that.
It was generally well-understood by the board that it would be likely the policy would be amended again, but Major, who is up for re-election in November, opted to move forward.
Major was frustrated that there hadn’t been discussion in the time since the first reading about the policy among board members, and that no emails were shared among them about any suggestions. The original policy draft was provided to every school board member on Feb. 3, Major said, adding that he had been in conversation with Tom Glick, District 5, and Logan Schulz, District 6, about the policy.
The policy was approved, but there really wasn’t any discussion about the contents itself.
Policy information
The policy establishes a transparent process for reporting employee injuries caused by student, parent or staff conduct and supports data collection for continuous improvement.
According to D525, the school board will designate a corporation administrator to collect and maintain records of each unique employee injury incident, which will be reported to the school board with regular frequency.
If a workers compensation claim is filed or an employee has to miss school because of an injury, a closed session of school board members will be convened to discuss the incident, including, among other things, any potential action against the person responsible for the injury.
A committee of safety and security team leaders, school board members, school faculty and staff, and parents of students will also be appointed by the board to review the policy, monthly reports, end-of-semester reports and end-of-year reports. Based on those reports, the committee will create and present recommendations of changes to the policy or school safety improvement plans to the school board.
Those interested can read the policy in full at BCSC’s BoardDocs page.
CEA viewpoint
The president of the BCSC teacher’s union, the Columbus Educators Association (CEA), Amy London, said that the matter of school employees being injured by students is in no way just a BCSC phenomenon, but something school districts across the state and country are dealing with.
London said the increased numbers of information-only incidents described by Major ring true to the experience of CEA membership and that the majority of the incidents involve students on the elementary level. She also said that many of the students involved in these incidents are in special education.
“I think it’s a very individualized situation because in my observation of being a teacher for the last 26 years, the type of behavior support that students have needed has increased and become more intense,” London said. “Mental health issues have been something that teachers have had to try to support students with in the classroom and we are not necessarily trained to do that.”
“It just seems to be the level of the type of behavior that students are exhibiting is more severe,” London went on. “…We see that a lot of the students that exhibit these behaviors are in special ed.”
BCSC is working to foster a culture of safety for its teachers and students, London said, but the accountability piece is still missing.
“I worry that we are not at a point, based on the behaviors that we see from kids now, that we are not working to foster a culture of accountability,” London “.. “Even 10 years ago in teaching, if a student were to exhibit a particular behavior or harm someone, there was a specific consequence that happened. And it seems like the line has moved.”
London reasoned that the moving of that line doesn’t come from BCSC in particular, but pointed to social media and the behavior it can bring out in students as one factor.
London said that the new policy itself does a “good job of making sure that incidents are reported,” but that it’s missing the accountability piece.
She also had further questions about some of the process of the policy, including but not limited too, more information about the administrator that would be in charge of maintaining the records and how it would ensure incidents are all reported in the same way.
She also said that she would hope that monthly and end-of-semester reports giving an overview of all incidents would be made public versus just being presented to the school board, plus that the committee that would continually review the policy and discuss certain incidents would also have a CEA representative.


![[Aggregator] Downloaded image for imported item #904659](https://www.therepublic.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/preview-12-696x464.jpg)
![[Aggregator] Downloaded image for imported item #904665](https://www.therepublic.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/preview-16-696x464.jpg)





![[Aggregator] Downloaded image for imported item #904620](https://www.therepublic.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/preview-696x464.jpg)

