Letter: Waterfront project money could be used elsewhere

Businesswoman hand working with new modern computer and writing

From: Greg Dinkins

Columbus

As from the beginning, I am questioning the benefits of the proposed riverfront project.

First, I totally agree that the dam should be taken out and the river restored for the proper preservation of the fish population and flow of the river.

My concern is what benefit do the citizens get in return for the $8 million in taxpayer money?

Yes, there would be a "water park" the people could enjoy, but at what additional costs? Lifeguards would have to be hired. Clean up after floods would have to be paid for. Where would the parking be? Where would access to the river be? Would there be a fee?

I don’t see any way there would be a return on investment. It would just be a huge expenditure with no ROI and limited community enjoyment.

I understand when the city gives tax abatements to local companies with new business or expanding business developments — it leads to increased employment and increased tax revenues in the future. Thus, a worthwhile investment for the future.

I also understand the expenditures for the People Trail that has an outgoing expenditure with no incoming revenue. This is something for all the community to utilize and enjoy. It promotes well-being, fitness, and recreation to anyone who wants it. In fact, this project has attracted attention nationwide and has helped make Columbus a "desired place to live" in numerous magazines and newspapers.

Now, back to the riverfront project. The only positive thing, other than the dam removal, is the water park idea.

Now, for my alternative solution. The city has purchased Fair Oaks Mall for $5.9 million. They have a few good ideas like a CRH branch for wellness and treatment and some indoor sports facilities. Beyond that, I’m not sure what they have in mind.

I propose they take a million or two from the proposed riverfront project and build an indoor, year-round, water park and pool inside the mall. They could charge similar fees as Donner Park does for their water facility. These fees could pay for the personnel needed to operate the facility.

Talk about an attraction for the surrounding communities. When pools are closed all around us for nine months of the year, neighboring communities would bring their kids here for a safe, fun, and supervised experience.