Morton Marcus: The sinister sins of our state’s leaders toward higher education

Hear ye! Hear ye! The Indiana General Assembly and the governor of the Hoosier state have declared, by the passage and signing of SB 202, that intellectual diversity must be promoted by the faculties of our state-supported colleges and universities.

Henceforth, any student may report teachers for failure to promote intellectual diversity. Boards of trustees are responsible for the implementation of this new law. What penalties for failure to comply is not clear.

Naturally, the legislators left no clue as to what constitutes intellectual diversity. Will a faculty member in the geography department, who does not include materials concerning the Flat Earth hypothesis, be subject to discipline?

As a teacher of economics, I stressed the intellectual and empirical dispute concerning the efficacy of monetary policy and fiscal policy. In addition to an exhilarating lecture on the sanctity of perfect competition, I would extoll the work of Joan Robinson on monopolistic competition, which more accurately describes contemporary competitive markets.

I have vivid memories of giving an excessive amount of time to one student who had totally inexplicable concepts of economic behavior. He ultimately went to prison for fraudulent practices in the management of other people’s money.

Does intellectual diversity mean including the Holy Bible (which edition?) in the syllabus for history classes? Were the dinosaurs fallen angels, fallen Anglicans or merely faculty beyond a certain age?

Actual intellectual diversity terrifies Indiana’s moribund political leadership. They feel threatened by diversity of thought which deviates from their mythological tenets. Must Purdue or Ivy Tech students, who anticipate Santa’s visits, be accommodated in courses on tourism and hospitality as well as construction and aeronautics?

Will faculty members who advocate for the metric system be exposed as agents of foreign powers? Do legislators believe “Metrics are Marxist measures” that undermine traditional American standards based on the length of the royal foot and the distance between the royal nose and the extended royal middle finger?

Henceforth, the boards of trustees must submit reports to the Higher Education Commission on complaints by students or employees of the afflicted institutions concerning the behavior of the faculty with regard to violations of the new law.

As usual, the legislation itself carries no funding for the added staff and efforts of the affected institutions. Higher costs of operation? More meetings with travel expenses? Higher tuition fees?

That the Indiana General Assembly would be so callous, so uninformed as to pass this legislation is no surprise. That the Governor would sign it is an indication of undisclosed ambition or willful gullibility.